Centre may slap case on Arundhati : Arundhati had vocally stated that Jammu and Kashmir was never a part of India

Allahabad: Booker prize winner and activist has whipped up yet another storm by stating rather vocally that Kashmir was never a part of India.

The Jammu and Kashmir Police is looking into the controversial speech of Arundhati Roy on Jammu and Kashmir’s accession to India and does not rule out taking action against the high profile writer and activist. In fact, sources in the government said that a case under 124-A under Indian Penal Code for sedition is possible against Hurriyat Conference Chairman Syed Ali Shah Geelani and writer Arundhati Roy for their anti-India speeches.

J&K Police looking into controversial speech

The Jammu and Kashmir Police is looking into the controversial speech of Arundhati Roy on Jammu and Kashmir’s accession to India and does not rule out taking action against the high profile writer and activist.

Highly-placed sources in the state home department said the transcript of the speech delivered yesterday at a seminar ‘Wither Kashmir: Freedom or enslavement’ organised by Coalition of Civil Societies (CCS) here has been handed over to the legal department for examination.

Meanwhile, the law officers of Delhi Police have concluded that there is a case for booking writer Arundhati Roy and hardline separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani for sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code. But the decision on whether to actually take action will be made only after further consultations at the highest level, sources in the Home Ministry said.

Delhi Police sources said they had sought legal opinion on the nature of charges, if any, against Geelani and Roy, and clearance from the Home Ministry.

If legal opinion favours registering a case against the Booker prize winner, the state police would register the same, sources said. Roy is alleged to have questioned Jammu and Kashmir’s accession to India.

“Kashmir has never been an integral part of India. It is a historical fact. Even the Indian government has accepted this,” she said, and also alleged that New Delhi became a “colonising power” soon after its independence from British rule.

This is not the first time the writer has run into rough weather over her speeches. Earlier, her pro-Naxal write up and speeches had forced Chattisgarh Police to seriously think of booking her for waging war against the country.

On another occasion, Biswajit Mitra, a former BSP leader, had accused her of supporting naxals and demanded action against her following which Director General of Chattisgarh Police Vishwa Ranjan had asked the state legal department to give their opinion.

Bullets spare none 16 or 65

Roy has come under criticism for her article on naxals — “Gandhian with guns”. The Chief of Chattisgarh Police had said in April this year, “I do not know whether Arundhati Roy has been wrongly influenced by others or she is actually a mole in the civil society. How do I know?”

Cong wants Arundhati to withdraw J&K statement

A senior Congress leader asked noted writer and activist Arundhati Roy to withdraw her statement on Kashmir, saying it was ‘contrary to historical facts’ and could mislead the nation and the international community.

Reacting to the comment made by the writer at a seminar in Kashmir on Sunday, AICC member Satya Prakash Malaviya said, “It was really surprising to see such an irresponsible statement from someone who is one of the country’s best-known writers.

“She must withdraw her statement which is contrary to historical facts and could mislead the nation as well as the international community,” he said. The Booker Prize winning author had said “Kashmir has never been an integral part of India. It is a historical fact. Even the Indian government has accepted this.”

The former Union Minister said that Roy “would do better to brush up her knowledge of history and know that the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir had acceded to the Union of India after its erstwhile ruler Maharaja Hari Singh duly signed the Instrument of Accession on October 26, 1947.

“And the state, consequently has become as much an integral part of India as all the other erstwhile princely states have.”

Source: Agencies

Courtesy: MSN NEWS, 26/10/2010

******

We are with Arundhati Roy

Arundhati Roy’s statement “kashmir has never been part of India” has created an uproar leading to a threat to slap a case of being anti-national against her. Arundhati has not just uttered a cursory statement– she has been reporting, analyzing and explaining the situation in Kashmir since 2008. She has been for justice for the common man everywhere– not only in Kashmir. We are with Arundhati Roy.

We all know that Kashmir was a free country even when India was under British rule. The fact that Kashmir is being forcefully controlled by India is evident from the fact that for the last 20 years it had to be kept under military surveillance. The infamous rule AFSPA, condemned even by the UNO is implemented there for the same period. In the last 2 decades more than a hundred thousand Kashmiri people (formerly known as a peace-loving, hospitable race) have been killed or are missing. Do we need a bigger proof? Can anyone imagine the plight of the youngsters born in the last 20 years? There is no media to report, no trade, no education. Hospitals cannot fucntion as doctors are unable to get curfew passes. Living with a daily dose of loot, rape and killing– how long can they remain quiet and docile? In this situation to say ‘Kashmir is ours’ is a big hypocrisy. Do we torture and kill our own people? India has miserably failed to resolve the Kashmir issue due to its lack of understanding. Use of brute force for 20 long years has escalated the matter.

We demand restoration of peace and freedom for the people of Kashmir.

Sumitra Padmanabhan, General Secretary
HUMANISTS’ ASSOCIATION
[on behalf of all members]

Read Also: WHY DO WE NEED THE ARMY’S CONSENT?

YES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT KASHMIR

Share

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>